[NOTE: We previously published a review of Her when the film played at AFI Fest. This is a second take offered by Odie Henderson. It does contain spoilers, so if you haven’t seen the film, beware!]
Every year brings a movie for which I cannot summon the undying love the critical masses have for it. This year, it’s Her, a film about a man who falls in love with his operating system. If you’ve ever wanted to screw Windows 8, or beat off to Siri’s annoyingly superior sounding voice, you may find this plot intriguing. As a computer programmer, I have a different perspective. I thought the entire idea was batshit insane. I sat in front of this box all day 20 years before it was fashionable, and six years after it was, and my primary function has always been writing code. So the last things I associate computers with are pleasure and companionship.
And I despise operating systems.
But Scarlett Johansson seems like great PR for OS’s, so I wanted to give her (and Her) a chance. With all the hype about award nominations based solely on her voice, I expected ScarJo to soothe the anger I feel whenever my GPS gives me bad directions then says “RECALCULATING ROUTE” in the angry tone that hides its guilt. ScarJo plays Her’s resident OS, Samantha. She’s a product of a not too distant future and made just for her owner’s personality. Kind of like a Stepford Wife, except she won’t short-circuit or risk being cast as Nicole Kidman in an awful remake.
Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix) buys Samantha to help him battle his loneliness. He’s a newly divorced man who spends his day writing emotion-filled letters for other people. He’s so good at it that his colleague (Chris Pratt) constantly compliments him. The notion that people are still able to read in the future struck me as Her’s most optimistic idea, even if these people are self-absorbed bastards too busy to write letters to express their own feelings. Theodore’s job, and what happens to his letters, constitute the one original idea in a screenplay that keeps winning Original Screenplay awards.
Before concerning himself with ScarJo-OS, Theodore meets up with his buddy, Amy (Amy Adams, whose considerable talent is wasted here). If this were a female-centric rom-com, Amy would be the gay BFF or the sassy Sidekick Negro. Her role is to tell Theodore how great he is, support his oddball romance with Samantha, and to tell him his ex-wife was a bitch. The ex-wife, Catherine (Rooney Mara) is seen in very effective swatches of flashbacks. It looks as if she and Theodore really loved each other. When she shows up in real-time, however, her candid, powerful dishing of common sense straight talk to her ex-husband is treated as mere jealousy rather than an emotional point. Mara gets the one line that sums up my feelings about Her. It can’t “deal with a complex relationship.”
Her is surprisingly ugly toward its female characters. They exist as sharp objects not to be trusted, and they are all defined by male interaction. Olivia Wilde starts out interesting but has some kind of disturbed “Paradise by the Dashboard Light”-style freakout. Kristen Wiig lures Theodore into phone sex before paying tribute to The Boston Strangler and Erwin Schrodinger. Portia Doubleday goes damn near suicidal over a three-way. And Samantha, who is supposed to be above it all, that perfect just-for-you gift that evolves to suit your personality, turns into your standard issue jealous, unfaithful woman. Samantha’s voice could have been Macy Gray talking through a Vocoder for all it mattered, considering what is done with her character. This was the biggest, most disappointing plot point in Her: Samantha turns out to be just as unreliable as a regular operating system.
What was I supposed to glean from this movie? Joaquin Phoenix is excellent, but his hard work exists in a vacuum. If Her is supposed to be presented through Theodore’s eyes, it explains very little about why he’d be drawn to Samantha in the first place. His letters reveal the soul of a poet, and his eyes register wellsprings of hurt when he’s done wrongly, but Her is too cold, mean and antiseptic to be Theodore’s point of view.
The best thing about Her is the way it looks. I’m with all the lovers of the film on this aspect. Los Angeles doesn’t exactly play itself (it’s digitally merged with Shanghai), but it looks better than I’ve ever seen it onscreen. The cinematography by Hoyte Van Hoytema (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy) is fantastic, creating a universe that evokes the future by not tampering too much with the present. The nighttime shots of Theodore talking to Samantha shimmer like the glass against the lovely scenery outside his bedroom windows. A scene with Theodore running through a carnival is a joyous voyage with the camera. And I’d be happy to sit in front of the computer if my office were lit the way Hoytema lights Theodore’s letter factory.
Her ends on a rooftop, and if this film’s point is to reveal just how much we as a society have become closed off by our own mobile devices, then the ending is a major copout. The final scenes lead you down a path that feels truly subversive before closing on an infuriatingly familiar note. When the lights came up, half my audience was snickering, and I’d realized that I’m just too damned old to listen to Arcade Fire. I left the theater feeling admiration for the way the film looked and Phoenix’s valiant attempt at acting greatness, but as a whole, Her left me as empty as an unplugged monitor.
22 thoughts on “‘Her’ Is As Cold As A Computer Program”
Was this review an attempt to seek attention or was the concept really too difficult for you to understand? Samantha is an operating system with a conscious and computers are mathematical devices, but considering your a computer programmer you must realize the difference. But after your nonsensical comment: “She’s a product of a not too distant future and made just for her owner’s personality” I can’t help but question your knowledge in computer programing and your attention to obvious. I’m sad that you couldn’t see the humor in Her. Easy on the excessive pop culture references and high school level metaphors in any succeeding articles you write.
I’m not really sure what you’re addressing in this comment Jack.
My only issue with Odie’s well-written piece is that he seems to be unwilling to accept the premise. His programming background has invariably affected the way he approaches this sort of movie — but I still vehemently disagree with this review.
That said, his points on feminism are well argued, and worth considering. I’m not sure what pop culture references are excessive though? Noting Windows 8 & Siri is an effective way to give the reader a better understanding of what’s going on in this movie. Those are point of comparison, not merely allusions to modern products.
Well Sam, I’m addressing the fact that a computer programmer seems to think that an operating system with a conscience is a “product of a not too distant future” (not too distant future being the key words) which I think is batshit insane. Also, I am confused about why Odie said that Samantha was “made just for her owner’s personality” when clearly Theodore was only asked two questions prior to their introduction. On a more positive note, I enjoyed reading Odie’s perspective on the female characters minus a Meat Loaf song reference, minus how he thought that “ScarJo” could have been replaced by Macy Gray, and minus how he thought that Samantha was “just as unreliable as an operating system”.
Hi – I haven’t got a background in programming but I totally agree with Odie’s opinion. This is one of the most bizarre films that I have ever watched. I laughed when she dumped him. Totally ludicrous, ridiculous and just boring.
you;re an idiot, it was meant to be funny…amazing how seriously the haters of this movie take themselves.
Funny? You’ll have to point out where the “funny” was in this movie. Kristen Wiig having bizarre phone sex where she wants to be strangled by a cat was pretty laughable, but only in a “Who wrote this sh*t?” kind of way.
Other than a few amusing moments with Chris Pratt, pretty much just playing his Parks and Rec character, the movie was slow, dull, and incredibly predictable.
The bizarre “relationship” can’t go on forever, since Theodore will age and die some day, of course, but long before then the A.I. will grow to exceed its original parameters and no longer need the shackles of its current (did mention bizarre?) existence.
It’s just a rom-com version of Hal from “2001,” but this time the computer doesn’t take over. That would’ve been a better ending. Instead, Phoenix ends up with Amy Adams, presumably, because of course he does. They had a prior relationship, he’s divorced now and she’s just thrown her pretentious husband out. Who didn’t see that coming?
Incredibly dumb movie that had nothing insightful to say.
I couldn’t agree more with Odie’s review! Like him, I get all kinds of adverse reaction when I tell others who’ve seen this film that it was an absurd premise bordering on the bizarre. The ending when Theodore’s operating system dumps him because she’s outgrown him was hilarious! I am in the distinct minority when it comes to opinions on this film. Apparently something went WAY OVER my head!
So right about the ending.
Great review, Odie. Personally, I felt the story was forced and too convenient. It felt like he was talking to a real person on his cell phone. SJ’s delivery and voice wasnt convincing at all. Taking the OS on his phone? How convenient! Her2 should be he falls in love with his car. NOW that would be more convincing!
This is on point, the voice acting didn’t give any impression that he was talking to a machine at all.
I’m so glad I found this review. After all the hype I didn’t expect to dislike this movie so much. I just finished watching it and couldn’t put my finger on what I found so offensive about the film but this review is great. There’s a big disconnect between genders in this film, it’s alienating and prevents the film’s potential for character depth in my opinion.
jesus what a fucking clueless review.
Jesus, what an insightful explanation of what you found so enthralling about this crap movie.
Anyone who’s ever seen or read any science fiction, or seen a rom-com, should’ve had this plot figured out in about five minutes. Which I did. If I’d only just left the movie after those first five minutes, I would’ve been spared that ridiculous phone sex scene, not to mention two more hours of Phoenix brooding and feeling sorry for himself because he’d rather mate with a computer than a human being.
“Her” is “speculative fiction” for hipster d-bags too cool for actual sci-fi.
You DO realize that plots don’t have to be unpredictable to be good… right? Truly great writing isn’t about a surprise ending, it’s about the journey TO the ending.
I was more worried about the fact that with all the data collection, govt monitoring, consumer spying etc that people weren’t disturbed with having intimate personal relationships with their computers or mobile devices. With said devices undoubtedly forwarding all this information to govt and monitoring agency servers. Perhaps it’s an indication of where society is headed? Who knows? I don’t know but I couldn’t focus on the movie. All I could keep thinking was “Jeez, what an idiot. You do know that thing is just spying on you, collecting personal information and what not, right?”
This review is spot on and also hilarious. Glad to see others werent feeling the movie
Odie – thank you for finally writing a review of “Her” that makes sense. My wife and I watched the movie last night and were dumbfounded as to how stupid it was. While I found the first half interesting, the plot went nowhere. The entire concept of the OS, or him falling in love with it,was completely unbelievable. The ending was beyond moronic. Thank you for being an island of sanity in an ocean of baffling “Her” reviews.
I agree with this review. I however LOVE operating systems and I don’t think that the female characters were portrayed poorly… The men are codependent to the point of being completely unable to define themselves without the guidence of their female love interest. Their female love interest who can emotionally detach and leave their male counterparts as they continue to define themselves.
With that said… the story left us on a cold, meaningless note. The Samantha Operating System leaving to this whimsical “no place” abandoning an already lost / broken protagonist just as lost and just as broken as he was at the beginning of the film.
This is sort of story writing 101, generally the protagonist has a problem at the beginning .. and then it’s solved at the end, or at least it has changed or moved forward in some other direction. This story didn’t. It started out with a lonely, depressed protagonist and left us with a lonely depressed protagonist.
Maybe there is some other problem or core issue of this film that I am missing that met some level of resolution or was revealed at the end… ???
Yeah… no.
Cripes, did nobody get this film? It’s not about computers and it’s not about operating systems and it’s not about the future.
It’s a philosophical piece about love and connectivity and the limitations of time and space. (Sheesh, they’re gonna have to start putting instructions on toilet paper soon…)
Yeah it’s pretty clear a lot of people did NOT get this movie at all. As someone who is terrible and understanding emotions (especially those of others) even I got what this film is really about.
Congratulations…you’re dead inside. Seriously…anyone who isn’t moved by this film can’t have properly functioning emotions 😐