“Litter Stops Here” reads the sign that’s prominently displayed in front of April O’Neil (Megan Fox) at the beginning of an early setpiece in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, the reboot of the Gen-Y-favorite franchise that spans films, video games, TV shows, and comic books. And in some ways, it’s true: trash stops on the big screen. In this case, however, that’s where the trash starts. No doubt, the people involved with this film might side with April’s cameraman (Will Arnett), who tries to convince her of the value of “froth” in news reporting, of making something fairly mindless that’s enjoyable to the masses. There’s nothing wrong with froth (or “candy,” as he says), but it has to be done well all the same. For myriad reasons, this new take on a quartet of mutated turtles who can take down faceless foes with the swiftest of ease is mostly uninspired, awkward, unfunny, and utterly charmless. It’s the very opposite of candy.
April is determined to break out of the doldrums of NYC TV news reporting, and decides that her meal ticket is the mysterious story of a vigilante group trying to fight back against the feared Foot Clan group of criminals. Of course, as most everyone watching the film knows, the group isn’t human at all, despite having good, heroic intentions. No, they’re four mutated and powerful turtles: Leonardo (Johnny Knoxville, for some reason), Raphael (Alan Ritchson), Donatello (Jeremy Howard), and Michelangelo (Noel Fisher), who’ve been warned by their master and surrogate father Splinter (Tony Shalhoub, also for some reason) to avoid leaving the sewers in case they’re found out by presumably (and logically) confused masses. But the turtles can’t stand by while injustice is committed, crimes are done, and so forth. So, with April’s help, they end up facing their great nemesis, Shredder, who’s being aided by a greedy industrialist (William Fichtner) with ties to April’s past.
The script, by Josh Appelbaum, André Nemec, and Evan Daugherty, doesn’t waste much time acknowledging the silliness inherent in the entire Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles mythology, if such a thing truly exists. When Arnett’s character asks April if the turtles are aliens, she responds curtly, “No, that’s stupid.” (This is a weird in-joke referencing the early period when this film’s producer, Michael Bay, said the turtles would now be aliens instead of mutants. And, as we all know, alien turtles who like Pizza Hut is far more ridiculous than mutated turtles who appreciate the same.) Roughly half of the film transpires before any human aside from April even admits the possibility that her theories aren’t total bull. While it’s nice that the film pays lip service to the concept being dumb, all of the jokes—and there are many of them, all at April’s expense—simply make the whole affair incredibly, and obnoxiously, self-conscious. Yes, the premise of mutated turtles who are ninjas and going through puberty is silly, but you might as well own the silliness.
Perhaps the real issue is that parts of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are intentionally silly, while others are taken as seriously as the brooding in a Christopher Nolan Batman movie. (The silly parts, as luck would have it, are heavy with pop-culture references, such as a few to Christian Bale’s take on the Caped Crusader. Plus, references to Lost, which is always super-timely. Remember Lost? That show about the island and the hatch and…never mind.) April may be in over her head, but the turtles too often are crafted as serious heroes, not a bunch of chuckleheads who happen to be gifted with super-strength. The action sequences, also, seem to be of a piece with other CGI-heavy blockbusters. One, in particular, quotes heavily from the snowbound sequence of Inception, at least when director Jonathan Liebesman isn’t instructing his cinematographer to spin the camera 360 degrees around the characters, to the point where it’s difficult to tell what’s going on or why anyone should care.
The CG itself is an unpleasant addition to the series. The original series of 90s-era films may not be that impressive separate from childhood nostalgia, but the tactile quality of the turtles, as created by Jim Henson’s Creature Shop, is vastly superior to the computer-generated editions of the turtles. Too often, the turtles’ CG-ed stretchy faces are reminiscent of the unpleasant-looking Martians from Disney’s execrable Mars Needs Moms, never a welcome comparison. In general, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is a dull and mostly lifeless affair. (Arnett is the sole bright spot, even as it’s mildly depressing to watch him play a variation on Gob Bluth in his fruitless attempts to impress the oblivious April.) Leonardo, Raphael, Donatello, and Michelangelo are at the center of a dumb and ridiculous concept; the more this movie acknowledges that fact, the more it reveals its own lack of confidence in the project.
8 thoughts on ““Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” An Uninspired Revival of the Iconic ’80s Heroes”
“Perhaps the real issue”… is that really bad concepts that made popular cartoons don’t translate to the silver screen. This was a movie that was always going to be bad no matter what they did.
Wrong. This movie had potential to be good but they decided to make stupid decision after stupid decision, resulting in a major wasted opportunity. Look at X-Men; stupid concept (that made a popular cartoon) of people just born with abilities despite how evolution actually works and yet the franchise has its hits and misses. Smurfs and Alvin & the Chipmunks could’ve been good kids movies despite their concepts (I guess talking cars and legos and toys are much better concepts?) but they chose to be lazy and dull much like this TMNT movie.
No way kimosabe.
* X-Men is not a dumb concept because they are people like other accepted superheros. They are not turtles.
* Smurfs is not a dumb concept because it belongs in a completely fantastical world, but made a dumb concept with live action.
* Chipmunks is a dumb concept that can only be a cartoon.
* The Lego movie worked because it existed within itself with a little real world surprise in the end that produced the imagination aspect of Lego toys. Legos weren’t walking around with the citizens of New York City. It would not have worked.
TMNT was doomed to fail because it was a dumb concept and can only be a cartoon, much like the Smurfs and Chipmunks. Even the title is stupid…”Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle.” It’s been proven enough times. Not all cartoons are translatable. Of course, this doesn’t mean that those that are translatable will automatically make good movies. Just look at some of the Transformers (though fun enough to watch) and G.I. Joe (just garbage).
If the concept of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles doesn’t work? Can you kindly explain why the 1990 film not only was a financial success but is still today considered highly not just by fans of the franchise but by the general public.
Regarding any outlandish movie concept as just “dumb” is Snobbery my friend.
No matter how outlandish a concept is. All that matters is if the person handling the material handles it with respect and intelligence. Not just for the material but also for the viewing audience. Jurassic Park will always be a great example of that.
You have your “facts” wrong…
TMNT is not regarded highly by the general public at all. It was praised by the fan base (mostly children and their parents), but the first movie (1990) holds a 40% rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. They got worse from there.
Transformers 4 was “financially successful.” Still a very bad movie. Financial success is not the mark of a good movie, nor a good concept. It just means that people want to see it. But bad concepts will always struggle to be good movies.
It’s a cartoon and shall always be only worthy of a cartoon because of the concept. Care to see a live action Smurf or Snorkel film? Same thing. Some things are only going to work as cartoons.
What does Jurassic Park have to do with this? Dinosaurs are cartoon characters that aren’t real? Merging two live things (dinosaurs and humans) is not the same thing as merging cartoon characters with live human beings. This rarely works and usually fails when the cartoon is made to look as real as the human beings.
Your the one with the facts wrong. Parents did not praise 1990 film because it was pretty violent and had a dark gritty storyline. Which is why the sequels was dumbed down for a children and the violence was lessened.Which obviously ended up ruining those films. Rottentomatoes doesn’t hold much water with me. On IMDB it has a 6.7 out of 10. So that makes the figures pretty inconclusive. Most of the people I know who aren’t Fans of the Franchise look fondly on the film.
“Transformers” had an enormous budget, top level marketing, not to mention star power. It was gonna be a boxoffice hit no matter what. The 1990 TMNT film was only made for $13 million, featured unknown actors, and released as an Independent Film. So the fact the film made over $200 million at the boxoffice is nothing to scoff at. Also like to point out that the sequels made only $78 million and $42 million. Which again shows how well the 1990 film resonated with people. So much so that they rejected the sequels for being lesser than the original.
I brought up “Jurassic Park” because it has one of the most ridiculous storyline for a movie ever. Cloning Dinosaurs on an Island and making a theme park out of it. How is that less ridiculous than Mutated Turtles who learn to be Ninjas? Also the series isn’t a cartoon. It started as a gritty book. Get your facts straight.
Do you know what a fact is? It is a fact that Rotten Tomatoes holds that film at a 40. It is a fact that they got worse with every new movie. You didn’t dispute my facts. You merely added some while stating that mine were wrong.
Also, originally you tried to pass off that the general public holds it in high regards. This is not a fact, especially if it comes from only “most of the people you know.” Though it is rated highly by the audience at a 81% (Rotten Tomatoes), this is the fan base. I would state the general public hasn’t even bothered to see it. I know absolutely nobody, except my younger 31 year old wife, who thinks fondly on it. In 1990, she was 7 years old (I was 18). My childhood cartoon of choice was G.I. Joe. Looking back, they are crappy cartoons and were used as the source to make crappy movies (though boxoffice hits). I believe a G.I. Joe movie could work if they shove the cartoon to the side and take from the Marvel Comic series of the same decade. After all, they are mere human beings in uniforms.
Again…a box office hit does not equate to a good movie.
I can’t believe you actually don’t see the extreme difference between the completely absurd concept of a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle and a real dinosaur. Dinosaurs existed. The concept of merging dinosaurs and humans is far easier to swallow because both are real. Note that the dinosaurs weren’t super mutated mathematical genius dinosaurs skilled in Kung Fu.
I didn’t know that about the graphic novel origin of TMNT. Still, some things just can’t be done well on the silver screen. It is obvious I am not explaining this well. I don’t know why, but I just can’t see the TMNT concept as ever being a good movie.
Pingback: Reviews: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014) | Online Film Critics Society