Was Kurt Cobain murdered? Twenty-one years since Cobain’s death and there are passionate followers who protest that the Nirvana front man did not die by his own hand. Kurt Cobain’s death was officially ruled suicide by the state police, but that hasn’t been enough to sate those that feel foul play was involved. Soaked in Bleach expands on Nick Broomfield’s documentary Kurt & Courtney, a narrative born out of morbid curiosity to know exactly what happened during Cobain’s final days in the woods of Washington state. What makes Soaked in Bleach different from other conspiracy theory docs is the events of 1994 are viewed from the eyes of private investigator Tom Grant.
Grant, a former detective of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, was hired by Courtney Love to locate Cobain after he took off from a rehab clinic. Once Kurt Cobain’s body was discovered on April 8, 1994, it would seem that the detective’s efforts would be over, but what Grant pieced together lead him to believe that suspicions of Cobain’s death should rest on the shoulders of Courtney Love. Apart from some footage of Nirvana performing, the film spends most of the opening act establishing Grant’s credibility as a former detective with a clean record. Yet in no time at all, the focus shifts from establishing Grant’s trustworthiness transitioned into putting the spotlight on Courtney Love as a controlling, selfish person. Selling people on the concept that Love is kind of a bad human being isn’t difficult, but you have to do more than that to prove she is complicit in a murder.
Soaked in Bleach explains his account of the investigation and what ultimately led him to believe that Love was responsible for Cobain’s death, but he fails to fulfill the sole purpose of the film in providing any evidence that she did anything. The primary arguments contend that the heroin dosage Cobain injected would have made it impossible to pull the trigger, but such evidence cited ignores that Grant is quoting a figure from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, not the autopsy report. A lack of useable fingerprints on the shotgun and Grant’s assertion that Cobain’s final letter is actually a note announcing his intentions to leave Love round out the evidence director Benjamin Statler and his team offers.
Much like The Jinx, Bleach uses re-enactments, interviews, and voice-overs to make the case that Courtney Love murdered her husband and staged a suicide to cover the whole thing up, but it flounders in that effort, looking more like murder conspiracy docudrama. The re-enactments are rather amateurish (Tyler Bryan and Sarah Scott play Cobain and Love like they’re in an unaired episode of Unsolved Mysteries) and sticking with archival footage probably would have been the best choice Statler could have made.
There is enough in Soaked in Bleach to create a decent sizzle reel or a trailer, but trying to stretch the material to 90 minutes was a poor decision. With so little evidence to back Grant’s allegations, the film tries to fill lags with lackluster interviews with neighbors who overheard arguments in Cobain’s childhood home and a chat with Cobain’s high school principal to describe the depressing conditions of Aberdeen. When that doesn’t do the trick, footage of Nirvana on-tour and interviews with the singer-songwriter is spliced in as well. Eventually, Bleach return to the speculation and the documentary concludes with former Seattle Chief of Police Norm Stamper insisting that if he had the authority, he would re-open the case. Given that Stamper didn’t make that call in his 6 years as chief, it seems like another case of someone using Cobain’s death as their own soapbox. If Grant and Stamper wanted to make a documentary exposing police in Washington for their ineptitude, they should have done so.
Reviewing documentaries can often lead to reviewing the film’s subject instead of how it covers it, but even if Soaked in Bleach‘s message landed on sympathetic ears, the film makes curious decisions that distract from their central thesis. Dramatic recreations are lit like a low-budget horror film; Grant’s personal recordings overlap with dialogue from the fictionalized scenes; and bizarrely photos of John and Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Marilyn Monroe, Elvis, Michael Jackson are interweaved into the footage for seemingly no reason.
The evidence presented is circumstantial at best, and the arguments could only be viewed as cinematically compelling if you were predisposed to the theory that Cobain was murdered. Kurt Cobain will forever remain a fascinating figure, and any documentaries attempting to smooth over the pain that comes from his suicide will continue getting made. The uncomfortable truth is that Kurt Cobain, a musician many admired and related to, had a severe case of depression. It’s hard to admit when those we admire fall down or give up, but it is a part of living.
Brett Morgen’s Montage of Heck debuted on HBO in May. I mention this because any fan willing to spend money to watch a documentary about Kurt Cobain would be better served by going that route. Morgen’s film is the way to go for real insight into the life (and not just death) of one of the most influential musicians of the last century. When dueling documentaries air, the easy call goes to the film focused on how a life was lived, instead of the film that rehashes death.
16 thoughts on ““Soaked in Bleach””
Did you actually watch the movie Colin? ” bizarrely photos of John and Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Marilyn Monroe, Elvis, Michael Jackson are interweaved into the footage for seemingly no reason” This is bizarre to you? The photos are seen because forensic pathologist Dr. Cyril Wecht said that these are the cases that he has worked in his historic career. That’s difficult for you to figure out? It’s interesting you fail to even mention that Dr. Wecht is even in the film and what he thinks about the Cobain case. You’re doing nothing but spinning a bunch of BS. You should be ashamed of yourself.
He didn’t work on those cases. He consulted for RFK, and wrote a paper critiquing the handling of JFK’s case. So King, Monroe, Jackson are all thrown in for no good reason. The real action worthy of shame was adding in Philip Seymour Hoffman into this powerpoint of jackassery. Wecht also proposes that Elvis’ death was a lie, and that Jon Benet Ramsay died in a sex game. Way to pin your hopes on another conspiracy
nut, dude.
This might be true if John Fisk (first responder on the medical team), Vincent Di Maio (American Academy of Forensic Science) and Ian McIntyre (who still works at the San Diego Medical Examiner’s Office) weren’t in the film as well.
Yet another irresponsible biased review by a hack writer that refuses to fact check and who refuses to seriously look at the issues presented in the film. It’s so much easier to make mindless statements, most of them misleading, than to go into a movie like this with an open mind. These kinds of reviews do a disservice to the legacy of Mr. Cobain and the people who have done nothing more than ask for questions to be answered about a case that was clearly mishandled.
A few salient fictional points this writer tries to use!
“ruled suicide by the state police”
Did the city of Seattle suddenly
become a state? It was ruled a suicide the very same day by the Seattle Police
Department, Seattle being a city in Washington!
“but that hasn’t been enough to sate those that feel foul play was involved”
Right! Because any IDIOT can see there were issues with their investigation.
Did you watch the movie? Even the former chief of police stated he thought the case merited being reopened!
“what happened during Cobain’s final days in
the woods of Washington state.”
Seriously? When exactly was he in the woods?
“the film spends most of the opening act establishing Grant’s credibility as a
former detective with a clean record.”
I would say it was more like at most 5 minutes!
“Selling people on the concept that Love is kind of a bad human being isn’t difficult,
but you have to do more than that to prove she is complicit in a murder.”
This my friend is not a hard sell if you look at the facts surrounding the case and he absolutely bizarre behavior at the time.
“A lack of useable fingerprints on the shotgun”
Never mentioned in the film. The only reference was the gun was not
fingerprinted for 30 days and then given to Courtney Love to melt down.
“The evidence presented is circumstantial at best, and the
arguments could only be viewed as cinematically compelling if you were
predisposed to the theory that Cobain was murdered.”
I believe the film presents unanswered questions and inconsistencies that deserve to be addressed, that’s all.
“The uncomfortable truth is that Kurt Cobain, a musician many admired and related
to, had a severe case of depression.”
Are you trained to make this diagnosis? Can you point to any sources
that did in fact diagnose Mr. Cobain with depression? Because that’s a pretty big statement your making without one shred of evidence other than what the merry widow says at every opportunity presented.
Then of course you have to finally mention Brett Morgen’s Montage of Trash, the movie Buzz Osbourne, Mr. Cobain’ s life long friend and mentor called 90% bullshit and why would anyone believe one word out of Courtney Love’s mouth? But
disregard the facts and the glaring issues surrounding this man’s death. Keep your head buried in the sand like the so many else. And continue to make fun of
the people who ask for clarification because you don’t have the where with all
to see the obvious!
“wherewithal”
Note that Biggs only reply is a passive aggressive grammatical correction. Which stands to prove that Colin cannot live up to their last name and it probably wasn’t a coincidence that I mistakenly read their first as “Colon”.
Note that I don’t care.
The fact that you replied proves your statement is incorrect.
I question your ability to review films objectively. Here are some points I need to refute:
‘The evidence presented is circumstantial at best…with so little evidence to back Grant’s allegations’– really? When world leading experts such as Dr Cyril Wecht, who has lead over 38,000 cases to date, can prove that is was scientifically IMPOSSIBLE for Cobain to have shot himself, as well as scientific explanation to have proved it impossible for Kurt to have shot himself due to the position of the gun, i will definitely trust the expert rather than a hack writer such as yourself. Please don’t try to outwit the experts, it does you no credit.
‘Bizarrely photos of John and Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Marilyn Monroe, Elvis, Michael Jackson are interweaved into the footage for seemingly no reason.’ Had you done some research, you would have known that Dr Wecht had indeed reviewed and consulted on the high-profile deaths of all the above-mentioned high profile individuals. Legitimate reasons to include them.
‘(Statler) fails to fulfill the sole purpose of the film in providing any evidence that she did anything… you have to do more than that to prove she is complicit in a murder.’– did we watch the same film?!
‘The uncomfortable truth is that Kurt Cobain, a musician many admired and related to, had a severe case of depression. It’s hard to admit when those we admire fall down or give up, but it is a part of living.’ – depression aside, you are denying yourself some very basic facts here. Triple the lethal dose of heroin equates to Cobain being immediately incapacitated i.e. he COULD NOT pick up a gun and shoot himself. For the sake of argument, even if we theorised Kurt was ‘suicidal’, that does not give the person the right to murder him!
The icing on the cake has got to be your take and recommendation on ‘Montage Of Heck’ – ‘Morgen’s film is the way to go for real insight into the life’- The material was highly manipulated to form a ‘suicide’ narrative, with journal entries and copied and pasted together and interview footage taken out of context. Montage did not provide a true and truthful insight in to the life of Cobain.
Soaked in Bleach has raised many inconsistencies relating the shoddy investigation pertaining to Cobain’s death, we only ask that this case be reinvestigated by an independent body. It’s the small justice Kurt deserves.
You’re confusing your own personal knowledge of Cobain’s death, and the facts surrounding it, with the movie itself. If the movie fails to properly showcase the facts, or presents them in a way that lessens their impact, then your anger is misplaced. A movie reviewer coming in cold, and watching and then reviewing “Soaked in Bleach,” can only address what he or she is shown. They cannot interject their own personal knowledge of this or that fact, or the credentials of this or that forensic scientist, into their review. Even if they could, movie reviewers are, by the definition of what a movie reviewer is, bound by the limitations of what is shown on the screen. You should be angry at the film, which, by it’s incompetence, fails to do justice to it’s subject matter. A movie either succeeds or fails based not on it’s subject matter, but on it’s approach and artistry. “It’s not what a movie is about, it’s HOW it’s about it” is my favorite Roger Ebert quote, and the most useful for delving into the psychology of both the movie reviewer, and how a movie either succeeds or fails. Another quote by Ebert states: “There are no boring subject matters for movies. Only boring approaches.” Instead of viewing the movie through the eyes of a fan who knows more about Cobain’s death than the average person, try viewing it as a reviewer might, objectively, and see if those who dislike this film at least have a point.
sooooooo long discoussion but pretty.
In which city you live?
I live in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. How about you?
Team U.S.A! U.S.A!
Haha!! Team USA!!!!!!!
“I see you.”